Thursday, May 27, 2010

"It was the best of times, it was the worst of times."

I believe that quote applies very well to my Epson R1900 printer.

Because when it's good.... it's ohhh sooo goood. You put the right paper in and the results of a perfect print will make you want to treat it to an exquisitely aged red wine and the finest local artisan cheeses.

But then there is the downside.

I'm not sure if this printer is the best option for someone like me. I hate, hate, HAAATE being wasteful with just about anything. But I ESPECIALLY dislike it when it comes to the most expensive fluid on the planet: inkjet ink, combined with expensive fine art paper: Hahnemuhle Sugar Cane paper that costs a dollar a sheet for the smallest sizes and almost $3 for the larger ones.

A friend of mine who has this printer told me to print something, anything, once a week just to keep the nozzles and print heads functioning. But did I listen? Noooo. After the temper tantrum this printer has been throwing for almost 24 hours now, I will remember his advice and try to heed it from now on.

If you leave the printer off for months at a time, the print nozzles are very likely to dry out and you'll need to perform multiple nozzle checks and cleanings to make them functional again. THAT MEANS A TON OF WASTED INK! Uuuugh! I am so, so glad I stocked up on ink last year when I had the chance. Anyway... I'm getting ahead of myself.


The low ink levels here, see those? If this was your car, you'd be low on gas, but would have enough to get to a gas station and fill up (most likely).

If your car was made by Epson you would currently be stranded in the middle of the ghetto. With gas still in your tank.



So you check your Printer Status Monitor to see your ink levels. Maybe a couple of them are low, as shown above, but there is still ink in them, so you think you can perform your head cleaning and maybe even run off a print or two before it's time to replace them. But you'd be dead wrong!

Because when you tell the printer to perform the head cleaning, it'll go right ahead and begin the process (flushing your money directly down the toilet) and halfway through with ink levels like these, in the middle of the cleaning, you'll get an error message: "Could not complete cleaning."

WTF! So you get up and look at the printer and see the ink light on- meaning you have to replace an ink cartridge. You begrudgingly take out the old one, open up a brand new one, and replace it. Yay! Good as new! But the print head is probably still clogged, so now you have to go and do ANOTHER head cleaning. Wasting even MORE ink.

The worst part is, see that little graphic up there? The screenshot of the ink levels? Obviously the printer knows good and well just how much ink is in there.
It should be able to tell you whether or not you have enough ink to do a head cleaning!!! Why should it start the process when it SHOULD know it can't finish it? It would be so much easier if it just told you to replace the low ink cartridges, rather than starting to perform the head cleaning anyway and of course draining your nice full tanks of ink in addition to the ones that are already too low. But no.

Yes Epson. I see what's going on here.

And there isn't a damn thing I can do about it.

Ohhhhhhh, and another thing.
It's got a gloss optimizer cartridge for printing glossy images. From what I've heard, it's great, but the printer runs through it really fast. Whatever. I have never, ever used it because so far, all of my prints have been on matte paper. They look a lot better that way. Maybe one day I'll get into printing on canvas and want the shiny coating but for now, I always make sure I select matte paper in the print dialog so I won't use the gloss coating.

Yet... somehow... notice in the image above, the gloss optimizer (the ink that looks light gray) is NOT full. But I never use it, so it should be full up to the brim. Right? Am I crazy???
So even if you don't use it, ever, you're somehow going to run out of it.
I know, because it happened to me last year. Wouldn't you assume when it "ran out" (i.e. mysteriously vaporized), I wouldn't need to replace it since I don't ever use it??

If you had a random can of hominy in the pantry- even if you never ever eat it and don't even like hominy, so you wouldn't eat it, but it's there- and one day the can disappeared, you wouldn't need to run to the store and buy more hominy.
...Or would you?
OH YES!
Yes you WOULD!

And that's how this printer works, too! Even if you never, ever use the gloss, it will vanish into thin air one day and demand replacement. You will say "No, dear printer, for it is not I who ever uses the gloss and therefore you can print my prints just fine without it." So the printer will throw a tantrum like a petulant child and refuse to give you any more prints until it gets what it wants:
More gloss optimizer.

The best thing about this is that the gloss cartridge is only sold in packages of 4.
Ok, might as well stock up I guess.
EXCEPT
That they expire. And if you try to put in an expired cartridge? I'll give you one guess as to what happens.



I got 9 perfect prints out of it yesterday after replacing 3 ink cartridges and numerous head cleanings etc. This morning I fire it up, and since everything was perfect yesterday I assume they would be today, too. But no. I do a print on my fine art paper and get all kinds of lines and crap running through it.

My advice if you have this printer:

-Don't leave it turned off for months at a time.
-Before you print on your expensive papers, at least print a test sheet and do a head cleaning if you must. Then you're just wasting ink, not ink AND paper.
-And maybe after the warranty expires, check out a continuous ink system.


Friday, May 14, 2010

Bug-ket List

A lot of people have a 'Bucket List." A list of things they want to do before they kick the bucket!!
What's on yours?

I just got done reading this post on my good friend's blog: http://crochetingingeorgia.blogspot.com/2010/05/moth-identification.html

And realized I have a Bugket list. A list of bugs I want to see before I die. Even if not in their natural habitats, to see them up close would be amazing. Because I know quite well from experience that most often, photos of bugs just don't do them justice!!

First on my list is the Oleander Sphinx Hawk Moth. I drew one of them in my "30 Bugs in 30 Days" series (hard to believe this time last year I was starting that series!). It lives in parts of Asia and Africa and migrates over to Europe for the summer. Looks like I have some traveling to do!!

A little closer to home (but not for long since I'm moving some time this summer) is the Pink Katydid! I can't even remember how I found out about this thing. I believe I just Google-image-searched for pink bugs and lo and behold, apparently right here in the Pennsylvania mountains, you can find them! They are very rare (you would be, too, if you were fluorescent pink hanging out on a bunch of green plants with hungry birdies flying all around), but it sure would be neat to be able to find one. Since I'm moving to DC, PA won't be too far away and maybe I'd be able to plan a weekend of hiking next year if I don't get to find one this year.

Or, perhaps, I could plan a trip with a little more purpose...

According to this blog, next time I'm visiting my in-laws, I should go have a look at this nature preserve near Chicago. Apparently they had some there!
http://featuresblogs.chicagotribune.com/chicago_gardener/2007/07/katy-you-didnt-.html

Here is another great blog from a guy who seems to like bugs just as much as me, all about his encounters with pink katydids! Awesome!
http://jimmccormac.blogspot.com/search/label/pink%20katydid


Tuesday, May 11, 2010

2 timin'

I've been scarce on this blog and my artwork due to a lot of training... my first triathlon is in less than 2 weeks. And wouldn't you know, when I should be at my peak performance-wise, I've got a sore back that I'm trying to keep rested?? Anyway, I've been blogging about my experiences training for this race (and hopefully more will follow if I enjoy my experience)! I am a total newbie at this, and when I say that, I MEAN it. Not like some who say "I'm a newbie to triathlons. Oh but I've raced in mile swims before and done century rides and run marathons, no big deal." Um, no. This girl ran a 5k once like 3 years ago and then stopped running for a while due to a knee injury. My first experience on a road bike was this past January, and same with my first experience learning to swim with my head IN the water. Anyway, if you're wondering what I've been up to in my spare time, here 'tis:

http://sammytheseeker.blogspot.com/

I am still working on my caterpillars though, and plan to post a pic of my progress once I get a coat of paint on all the leaves I'm currently working on :)


Wednesday, April 28, 2010

Adaptive Caterpillar-tych

Jessi's 'Pillar Pic... "Peekaboo!"

My best friend since elementary school recently posted a couple of pics on Facebook of some monarch caterpillars. As you may have guessed.... I kind of have a thing for caterpillars- especially after spending so much time with them last summer at the Hershey Gardens butterfly house. Soooooo I've been wanting to paint some more 'pillars for a while now. After I saw this picture last week, I couldn't get it out of my head and the deal was sealed. It's been so long since I did anything art-y...

I HAD TO START SKETCHING.

After about 6 renditions, here's what I came up with:


I thought it would be best to keep the painting small as I don't have a TON of time to do anything too big and involved. PLUS I have a new technique that I want to try and really don't want to go experimenting with a big ol' expensive canvas!

I've had these two really nice 6"x8" canvases for a while that have just been sitting in a closet on a shelf where I see them ALL the time, but never had any ideas for them. They were given to me as gifts and 6"x8" isn't an "off the shelf" easy-to-find-frame-size, so I knew I'd have to paint something on them that wouldn't need a frame. Since I have two of them, I figured I would keep the two odd-sized canvases together and always assumed I'd use them for some kind of diptych. That seemed perfect for this project AND I love the idea of eventually doing a bunch of caterpillar paintings so why not do..... A CATERPILLAR DIPTYCH!

Cause we all know TWO are better than one! :)

I began working on ideas for the 2nd composition and made sure to arrange it so that the plants between on the two canvases didn't connect perfectly, but it would be enough to show they are meant to go together. Thus it can be hung vertically or side-by-side, and it won't matter which is on the right or left.


So... the new technique I mentioned.
Here you can see something I started last summer in my "30 Bugs in 30 Days" series, when I decided the background didn't have to be 100% photo-realistic ALL THE TIME, and for the first time I played around with bright colors and more imaginative effects.

There's a 2nd part of the new technique that I'm going to play around with on this one, too...


The leaves that are painted green here are probably pretty much done. Usually I'd blend them more into the background in a fuzzy way, the way a camera lens might if this was a photo. This time I'm going for something more illustrative- not necessarily catroony, but definitely not realistic either. I want to see what happens if I do some layers throughout the painting and these leaves are the furthest away, so they'll be close in color to the background and have no detail on them (but keep the sharp edges). I'll do some light coats of the background-yellow over them to blend them in a little more. As I work toward the foreground, I'll add more and more detail. I'm hoping to paint the caterpillar and leaves with as much detail as possible to really put the focus onto them. We'll see how it goes.

~ * ~ * ~

I've recently discovered that I'm not a hoarder after all. Like most artists, I have a decent stash of blank canvases put away just waiting for a creative moment. A lot were given to me as gifts; some I got when a local store went out of business and had canvases on sale, so I picked up unusual shapes that are harder to find at the big box art/craft stores.

When I pulled the little 6"x8" canvases down off the shelf, at first I thought I had 3 of them as there were 3 canvases all stashed together and from the side they were all the same size. I immediately considered doing a triptych, but found the 3rd canvas was actually 6"x12" (which is a pretty fun size to work with) so I put it away to save for another day.

I kept thinking about that canvas being 6" wide, the same as these, just sitting there up on that shelf. Today became "another day" when I decided it would make a perfect and really interesting long, skinny triptych with these caterpillars. When I showed my husband my idea, he arranged the canvases in yet ANOTHER cool and interesting way (cause he's an engineer and that's what they do) which made me even more excited about the project, since my slight hesitation was that if someone fell in love with all 3 canvases, would they be just happen to have the right long skinny wall to hang all 3 of them on???

Check it out:


I love this idea because I can paint them subtly enough to "go together," but no matter how they end up being hung they'll still have a nice flow between them. Of course, each of these can work as a stand-alone painting and I'll especially keep that in mind for the long one in the center. Then they can be placed in different spots throughout a room- or if all 3 don't end up being purchased together (sad!!), it won't look lonely :)


Friday, April 23, 2010

Earth Day, a day late

I surprised myself by not posting yesterday... Maybe because as much as I love the idea of Earth Day, for me every day is (and should be) Earth Day. I confess that yesterday I didn't do anything different than I would have any other day.

People's negative attitudes toward being green really get me down a lot of the time. I especially hate it when a BIG company like Staples announces a green initiative they're taking (and let me tell you, they do sooo much!! They're really inspirational), on their Facebook page for example, and instead of congratulating them or respecting that a BIG company like that is seeing how important it is... people just say negative things about "being green is a waste of time and money" or the like.

Why?
Why is it a waste?
Does it HURT anyone to be more green?

I read a great article in Reader's Digest a year or two ago and that was the author's main question.

Maybe right now there is still a lot of debate about whether or not climate change has been caused by man. Let's say by miracle of miracles that humans have had no influence on the Earth's changing climate whatsoever. (And let me tell you how relieved I would be to hear that!) Even so... does being green and being less wasteful HURT anything?

I only wish that someone could convince me that humans have nothing to do with it.

I hope that in a few years I'm proven wrong and the honeybee population bounces back and we can continue to enjoy affordable fruit and vegetables, not to mention everything else for which the bees are responsible.

I would love for all of the environmental worst-case-scenarios you hear about to be proven wrong and ridiculous.

.
.